35 Comments
User's avatar
Research Integrity's avatar

People are shocked to learn that Sam Bailey is sponsored by a company that produces Covid-19 tests. https://substack.com/@thepoisonedkiwi/note/c-113176091?r=451xdo

Expand full comment
The Word Herder's avatar

No, she’s not. She’s on it like a bonnet.

YOU are misleading anyone foolish enough to be on Substack and believe your drivel. Fuck arf, sez the dog.

Expand full comment
Research Integrity's avatar

What can you say positively about a person sponsored by a company that produces Covid-19 tests? https://substack.com/@thepoisonedkiwi/note/c-113176091?r=451xdo

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 6
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Research Integrity's avatar

We need life energy from real food and not from dead chemicals from the bottom of the test tube. She either works for the pharmacomafia, "maybe" she's just a low-intelligence person. You must be a clown.

Expand full comment
ClearMiddle's avatar

I discovered this about the person in question, quite a while ago, but thanks for pointing it out. I also made myself quite ill last year by taking a cocktail of "supplements" recommended by various former "alternative practitioners" of mine, and I may still be recovering from that. It's "learning the hard way", my favorite.

Expand full comment
Research Integrity's avatar

Welcome. These trolls from the pharmacomafia are complicating things. We need life energy from food, not alleged "molecules" or dead organic matter from the bottom of a test tube. The story of "molecules" is the foundation of the pharmacomafia. Fresh, species-appropriate food in its original form with as little damage as possible is the simplest and most effective for nutrition and health.

Expand full comment
ClearMiddle's avatar

That is what I was taught, beginning when I was 12, although I didn't always live by that principle, and I wasn't warned about vitamins and supplements until recently.

Most people appear to be taught by the culture and by the advertising that serves to shape it. My mother originally learned from her father, the owner and manager of a small town grocery store (IGA). Her mother's father was a wholesale distributor. Before I was 12 we ate much processed and heat-and-eat food.

I've read that nutritionists are taught from curricula originally developed by processed food companies. It's a problem.

Expand full comment
Jack Boulay's avatar

Rule of thumb.

When somebody looks too good to be true, they probably aren't.

And when they look like characters from the same casting agency that supplies the actors for 'Friends', as the Baileys do, they are probably not your friends.

Expand full comment
Research Integrity's avatar

We should eat food, not molecules. Very simple. But, Baileys are not so smart or they are paid by the pharmacomafia.

Expand full comment
Jamie Andrews's avatar

These group of cultists are truly unhinged. Jeremy Nell tried to ring up my Business to get me fired not realising it is just a co-working hub I don't work for. Christine Massey is now publicly doxxing members of my family.

All after Mike Stone made the criminal actions of doxxing the scientist involved in the project. These people are truly sick in the head. It is no wonder "No Virus" had such a bad reputation and never got anywhere.

Expand full comment
Research Integrity's avatar

Sorry to hear that :( The horror, I didn't see that for Christine. I mean, I know that Christine comes uninvited to people's front doors. These people are worse than criminals. It is something similar to a joint criminal enterprise.

Expand full comment
Jamie Andrews's avatar

Yes Christine has a history of threatening behaviour being arrested for it before.

Expand full comment
Lynne Sheppard's avatar

You know it would not surprise me if you are behind this account Jamie and you are simply having a conversation with yourself...

Expand full comment
Jamie Andrews's avatar

Hi Lynne, I will be pressing charges against the criminal actions of doxxing my family members online. I will be noting everyone's details who have supported such grotesque criminal behaviour including you.

Feel free to make the ridiculous case that this RI is my account. As it is not. It only makes you appear unhinged .

Expand full comment
Lynne Sheppard's avatar

Please can you explain why you deleted my previous question to you regarding your assertions about the Baileys et al? It was asked in good faith?

Expand full comment
Jamie Andrews's avatar

Please explain why you are part of a group commiting criminal and disgusting actions of doxxing members of my family and threatening me and my family's well being?

I don't own this channel hence I deleted nothing.

Expand full comment
Lynne Sheppard's avatar

Then please can you explain why 'Research Integrity' is deleting my comments, especially when one of these was a question which I specifically addressed to you?

Expand full comment
Research Integrity's avatar

You are a member of a group that is engaged in criminal activities.

Bonus info: You justify the wrongdoings of the group you are a member of. By doing something inappropriate and quite confusing, you generate a distorted picture of reality. A normal person would condemn these criminal activities.

With this message, I think you are sufficiently informed.

Expand full comment
Jamie Andrews's avatar

Feel free to reply on any of my public posts where I will not delete your reply.

But I will be sharing your disgusting involvement in a group and their criminal actions of doxxing my family members.

Expand full comment
Stuart Hutt's avatar

I wonder if Lugols iodine is on your naughty list also?

Expand full comment
Research Integrity's avatar

There is no list of mine. This is information from the Next Level forum. Discussions, questions, answers are held there: https://t.me/NEXTLEVEL_OnlineForum

Expand full comment
Susan LePen's avatar

RNA can’t pandemic

Expand full comment
Jamie Andrews's avatar

I am telling people the criminal actions that specifically the Baileys, Mike Stone and now Christine Massey have committed. How am I meant to know their motives? Ask them. I can tell you that they are sponsored by a PCR testing company... so that might be a bit of a giveaway as to their links to the mainstream and a reason why they never fully debunk the while of virology and keep onlookers trapped in a limited hangout of information.

Here is what they have done, the full story. I am not interested in continuing to go on with this as ultimately these people are scumbags that are willing to dox members of my family. If you cannot see what is wrong you are working work them

https://x.com/JamieAA_Again/status/1917691309407469686?t=TP5Cl-OdLykQEIYcvn6DsQ&s=19

Expand full comment
Lynne Sheppard's avatar

So what you are essentially saying is “you are either with us or against us” – now where have I heard that before?

It is disappointing to witness this continued division amongst those who, on the face of it, all appear to wish to increase public awareness of virology’s pseudoscientific methodology. As with any situation involving multiple individuals there will be more than one side to the story. People will need to use their discernment to try and understand how and why this apparent breakdown in communications occurred.

Expand full comment
Jamie Andrews's avatar

You are standing with a group commiting crimes and threatening my family and you have the galling hypocrisy to talk about division.

You are contemptible scum.

Expand full comment
Oshoman's avatar

GATEKEEPING 101……..

Expand full comment
Christina Robinson's avatar

What a load of rubbish unscientific, science is not scientific if only it truly were then people would not be running for their pills pharma or not. True health is fostered by eating real food, drinking water not from a running tap and tackling your mental and emotional state. You are all addicted to potions, pills and paraphernalia.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 5
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
ClearMiddle's avatar

Third leading cause? Not _the_ leading cause? I recall years ago reading a research report, dating from the early 2000s, that concluded the latter, and I've kept that in the back of my mind ever since. Given the level of scientific corruption that I'm seeing now (I didn't see it back then), I would be very surprised if it weren't the leading cause.

I notice that the CNBC article (from 2018) solicits an emotional response from readers in response to a brief story about a medical mistake. So the problem is medical mistakes, and we need to do something about those. No mention of corrupt research producing products that sicken and kill people for profit (or other objectives), without regard to life. Hmmm.

I believe the aforementioned research report also focused on mistakes. I don't have any details now about that particular report, from over 20 years ago (I believe), but in searching for it I did come across Dr. Gary Null's 2011 book _Death By Medicine_, which draws a similar conclusion, so I know that the idea has been floating around for a while. I haven't read the book and can't otherwise comment on it.

Expand full comment