Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pablum in Silico's avatar

All those long boring hit pieces Stone puts out can be so misleading, I think its known as gish galloping or sealioning, I find it questionable how has been defending sabotuers of The Perth Group against people like Mr Brink and Mr Knoll, the conceit and gas lighting is truly jaw dropping, he has defended the Bailey's pill pushing and he the Baileys have been mischaracterising a number of people not least Sasha and Jamie, labelling them as narcissists.

It's hard to know what Stone will do next and the thing is it is all so unnecessary anyway, suffice to say there are those who exploit the no virus position to push pills and have no problem soliciting divisiveness when criticised rather than just accepting they were wrong, then there are those wanting to honour people like Eleni and Stefan bu commissioning scientific experiments.

Mike if your are out there please put down the shovel and stop digging, its 2025 now and time to stop tilting at windmills

Expand full comment
Christine Massey FOIs's avatar

Mentioning someone's first name is now a "criminal" act? Since when? According to who?

Making a false allegation about someone committing a criminal act is certainly unlawful.

Mike Stone is one of the nicest people I have ever come across. Maliciousness is simply not part of his character. This article has done nothing to change my mind about that.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts